Thursday, January 12, 2006
The more I think about this, the worse it gets
Here's John Reynolds, Tory Campaign guru, on Derek "Nothing To Declare" Zeisman:
“He will go to court, and he is still an innocent man until he goes through this process.... He’s a nominated candidate for the next election, and he’s on the ballot. And his constituents will make up their mind whether they think this is a serious issue.”
Let me get this straight.
When it's Goodale and the Liberals, it's all about the "appearance" of wrongdoing, and the responsibility of parliamentarians to uphold the highest ethical standards.
But when it's about some no-name Tory pustule who's putting MY PERSONAL JOY AT MARTIN'S IMPENDING LOSS AT RISK, it's all "ooh, he's innocent until proven guilty... these are charges not evidence... I have considered my own behaviour and I have completely exonerated myself."
Up yours, Reynolds. Cut this f*cker loose. Now. Send him a fax: "Go. Go away. You're getting in between me and my Tory victory celebration, asshole."
Nothing explains this kind of Tory passivity except the kind of blinkered stubbornness that led to the Martin Supports Child Pr0n... etc etc from 2004. I can't believe that someone calling himself a Tory during this election would have the gall to even mouth the words "he's innocent until proven guilty." Um, hello? Suck my what? Don't you think this kind of undercuts the WHOLE FREAKING TORY PLATFORM, YOU ASSHOLES!
Pathetic.
Stand Up For Canada, Unless It's A Tory Under Indictment, In Which Case Stand Up And Plead Not Guilty Your Honour.
Don't do this to me. I've waited so long for the Liberals to lose. Soooooo long. Dear lord, please. Do the right thing. I'll never think bad thoughts about Stephen Harper again, I promise. Pretty please?
“He will go to court, and he is still an innocent man until he goes through this process.... He’s a nominated candidate for the next election, and he’s on the ballot. And his constituents will make up their mind whether they think this is a serious issue.”
Let me get this straight.
When it's Goodale and the Liberals, it's all about the "appearance" of wrongdoing, and the responsibility of parliamentarians to uphold the highest ethical standards.
But when it's about some no-name Tory pustule who's putting MY PERSONAL JOY AT MARTIN'S IMPENDING LOSS AT RISK, it's all "ooh, he's innocent until proven guilty... these are charges not evidence... I have considered my own behaviour and I have completely exonerated myself."
Up yours, Reynolds. Cut this f*cker loose. Now. Send him a fax: "Go. Go away. You're getting in between me and my Tory victory celebration, asshole."
Nothing explains this kind of Tory passivity except the kind of blinkered stubbornness that led to the Martin Supports Child Pr0n... etc etc from 2004. I can't believe that someone calling himself a Tory during this election would have the gall to even mouth the words "he's innocent until proven guilty." Um, hello? Suck my what? Don't you think this kind of undercuts the WHOLE FREAKING TORY PLATFORM, YOU ASSHOLES!
Pathetic.
Stand Up For Canada, Unless It's A Tory Under Indictment, In Which Case Stand Up And Plead Not Guilty Your Honour.
Don't do this to me. I've waited so long for the Liberals to lose. Soooooo long. Dear lord, please. Do the right thing. I'll never think bad thoughts about Stephen Harper again, I promise. Pretty please?
